![]() I don't mind unfinished cockpit textures and a few quirks here and there if it means I can fly an otherwise solid A340-600, fully knowing it will get finished. I am not sure i would use the word "antics." It is a different way of developing a product. I look for progress in each iteration, and V.80 is definitely solid progress from the prior version. I think the key here is to approach BB exactly as they claim. will probably pick up their A330 as well even though I have the BB. While this focus was most welcome due to the real world popularity of these aircraft, it. I have the Aerosoft and they are exceptional. AEROSOFT CRJ-700/900 Reviewed by: Marlon Carter INTRODUCTION Over the past few years, the primary focus of the FS community seemed to be centered on mid to long range airliners such as the 737, A320 and 777. and almost always push it back months (in the case of one of the developers you mentioned, even years). Aerosoft Airbus and the future FSL A320 blow this thing out of the sky.Īll do respect, I don't know of a single developer that ends up releasing a product on their target date. ![]() Version 1 will take 2-5 more years at the rate the devs are going. ![]() It's still a beta and a mess, I own it and it's my worst purchase.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |